Thursday, August 20, 2015

Syria’s Dead Find New Suspects: Bashar al-Asad Not Blamed in Loss of 1,400 Syrians

January 2014

The flight attendant on my flight from Qatar to America sounded like any other Westerner in his 20s, from pop culture, to family, to hobbies. But when he said he was Syrian, my curiosity woke up.

His immediate family had left Syria years before, but like many Middle Eastern immigrants, lots of his relatives stayed behind. At the time of my flight in late 2012, his family was still alive, but he worried for them.

The young man called himself a Christian. His sympathies lay with Syria’s President Bashar al-Asad—as do many Christian Syrians, who are a minority along with Al-Asad’s Alawite Muslim sect. But his real passion showed in his condemnation of Qatar’s media, which he believes stirs hatred among his people and gives only one side of the story. I heard this theme often during my four years in the Gulf emirate.

Al-Asad’s brutality over the past three years deserves no praise. Yet his rivals have reached their own crisis. The first two years of the civil war saw a highly fragmented coalition try to battle the government. Their disunity made foreign governments wary of supporting them. But as Western nations began to change their tone, growing news of radical Islamists among the rebel armies has deepened and further complicated the calamity.

Ironically, while the first series of peace talks in Geneva, Switzerland, is under way, headlines on the conflict are saying little about Al-Asad and much about the “1,400 dead” in January from the “rebel-jihadist clashes.” A three-way civil war is in full swing.

Lebanon’s top English newspaper cited the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights as saying 190 civilians have died. This includes 21 whom the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria executed at a pediatric hospital in Aleppo.

Back in Qatar, a Syrian man sat with his elderly father in a clinic waiting area a few months ago. Both smiled as they watched my young son playing on the seat next to them. He found a video of “Barney” on his smart phone and showed it to my son.

The man worked on a Qatari government farm. He had just brought his father from Syria. He had to evade gunfights in order to rescue his father. Now his father will live with him for the duration of the fighting.

He affectionately translated parts of our conversation to his father. The man’s voice was dry. His eyes were hopeless. He seemed too tired to try blaming anyone.

~~~~~~~~
(Originally published by Yahoo! Voices.)

It Does a Body Good? Reviewing Montana’s Effort to Legalize Raw Milk

In 1979, Jeff Lewis’s father started dairy farming in the scenic Bitterroot Valley in southwestern Montana. Today the business milks 260 cows three times a day. He tells me his milk gets tested “every time a truck comes to pick it up.”

Lewis opposed HB 574 during Montana’s 2013 legislative session. The bill aimed to allow small farmers in Montana to sell unpasteurized milk, also known as raw milk, with minimal regulation. He appreciates the present rules and costs that govern his Grade A operation, and would be wary of lighter bylaws.

For Lewis, the issue has nothing to do with size. Montana has no corporate mega dairy farms, he notes, adding that the biggest has 600 cows. Then again, he knows one farmer with fewer than 20 cows that have produced certified organic milk for years at a sizable profit of $2 per gallon. The issue for Lewis is to start easing parameters on “the guys who have Grade A dairies.” If that goes well, maybe the state could consider other options later.

Jennifer Holmes is another Montana dairy farmer. She tells me she supported HB 574, saying the bill looked like a “successful” program in Idaho. She resisted excessive deregulation, but wanted folks to have the freedom to make their own food choices.

Holmes interrupts a few times to tell someone something about “bottles” and “greenhouses.” She eventually states that safe milking involves cooling fresh milk from 100 degrees to 30 degrees in one hour. This takes special equipment that hobby seekers may lack.

Both Lewis and Holmes recognize the risks of unpasteurized milk – then move on. They like raw milk and hope to see it sell in Montana, provided it is done wisely.

HB 574 was defeated in April 2013.

~~~~~~~~
(Originally published by Yahoo! Voices.)

Papal Visit to Jerusalem Illuminates Christian Challenges in Holy Land

May 2014

Roman Catholic popes do not visit Jerusalem very often. But Pope Francis I is coming to town—and many right-wing Jews are none too pleased.

Last week the Israeli Shin Bet security agency ordered an undisclosed number of Jewish activists to stay out of parts of Jerusalem during the pope’s visit. The order said the activists were thought to be planning “disruptions” and “provocative illegal acts,” including what the Israeli newspaper Haaretz called a possible “major hate crime.” This follows a recent trend of right-wing efforts to call for “death to Arabs and Christians and all those who hate Israel.”

Jews and Christians revere the Tomb of King David in Jerusalem. But for Christians, Jesus’ Last Supper supposedly took place in a room above David’s Tomb, according to tradition—although archaeologists doubt the traditional site is the actual site. In any case, Israel permits Christians to perform services in the room only one day a year.

During the pope’s visit, the Israeli government might sign an agreement to give Christians access a few more days per year. According to Haaretz, this could anger many far right Jews, though no change of ownership or managerial responsibilities would occur. If the government makes such a move, it would bolster Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claims that Israel upholds religious freedom.

Author and Economist correspondent Nicolas Pelham contrasts many aspects of Christians living in Israel and those living in the Palestinian Territories. He says some Christians in Palestine have high political or economic position. Nine Palestinian towns, including Bethlehem, are obliged to have Christian mayors. And Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has attended three Christmas worship services.

Similar trends in Israel exist little or not at all.

Yet Pelham and others admit that whatever support Christians find in Israel or Palestine may just be politically motivated. Author and journalist Ray Hanania is a Palestinian-American Christian, and often blames Israel for the troubles of Christians there. But Hanania cares more about aiding Christians than attacking Israel:

“To survive, Christians need friends in the Middle East. And if Israel is willing to extend its hand to help us, I am not sure that as a Christian Palestinian I can say no.” Hanania doubts any chance of dialogue with Jewish extremists, such as those who created flyers condemning the pope’s visit because “the pope is responsible for the continued deception of millions of people who believe in false G-d’s [sic]” and because of “the lies perpetrated by the Christian faith for 2,000 years.”

But he puts no hope in radical Islamists, either. In fact, in an open letter to the pontiff, he asks for action against all extremists, since “Christians are not treated well by any side.” In a recent report on Mideast Christians, the Pew Research Center states the percentage of Christians in the region has cut in half since 1900.

So far the pope is on day one of his Middle East trip—Jordan. For three days in three nations, he will meet with kings, prime ministers, and patriarchs, Muslims, Jews, and Christians. Already he is discussing peace and religious freedom with whomever will listen.

~~~~~~~~
(Originally published by Yahoo! Voices.)

Summer Jobs for Teenagers: Making Money or Serving a Purpose

Every teenager needs cash, and every student needs to feel significant. What you do during your summer holidays can yield either of these blessings, or even both.

There is nothing wrong with mowing lawns—try it! But here are some other options to ponder:

Gas Station Clerk

You hate to pay gas prices. Working at a gas station will not give you any discount, but it will let you see the other side of the counter. People rush in, get their stuff, and rush out. Smile at them—it might make their afternoon! Ten years later, you may remember some of your regular patrons, or at least you will recall when gasoline cost half as much. Oh, and the shift options can be quite flexible.

Piano Teacher

It is Graduation Day +1, and you already forgot everything you studied for finals. But you likely still think about your favorite—or least favorite!—teacher once in a while. You are fairly good at music (not necessarily piano), and lots of your friends have little siblings—or perhaps your sister babysits a bunch of kids somewhere. Hire out your time and training to some parents who would love to see their prodigies learn the marvelous fundamentals of music. Practice an hour a week to keep up your skills, then smile to yourself when you ask the young novice to practice three hours a week. Be patient and encouraging, and know that you may be inspiring a life-long love.

Ranch Hand

Or farmer. Learn the real meaning of hard work. Let it seep into your very soul as you sweat out in the fields. Your work ethic may change forever. Watch the experts closely—even though they probably lack a huge savings account. Maybe they are rough around the edges. Maybe your level of education already exceeds theirs. But they are the salt of the earth. Oh, and speaking of which, learning to respect the land—its mercy, its judgment, and its stunning beauty—is essential for an enviable summer experience.

Camp Staff

Last but not least, summer camps are one of the best things America does for its youth. Learning about sports, friendship, and in many cases, God, are what make camps thrive across this nation. Do not plan on making much money here. But as non-commissioned officers form the backbone of any military unit, and as mid-level managers drive a company forward, so camp staff—usually in their 20’s but often in their late teens—create an unforgettable experience in the life of at least one kid in every cabin…if not all ten of them!

~~~~~~~~
(Originally published by Yahoo! Voices.)

Monday, August 3, 2015

Finding Gems in the Treasure State: Homestead Cabins in South-Central Montana

An old logging track and ditch lead through the woods to a small clearing as the sun shines down patiently. There, wooden boards, a sloped ceiling, and a large rectangular shape are obvious—the remains of a homestead cabin. But the roof lies mostly flat on the ground, fairly burying the floor and crumpled walls beneath it. A rusty beer can lies in a nearby bush, not far from an iron seat—possibly from an early tractor. Bees defended the former home late in the summer, but they have vanished by November.

Records show that a husband and wife once homesteaded here. Herbert and Eva Roquet built the house and claimed the surrounding 243 acres in 1926. Herbert acquired the land from the United States, but in 1927 he formally added Eva’s name to the property. They sold their plot in 1929 to a nearby rancher for $1000, having joined the thousands of successful homesteaders—albeit only briefly.

Herbert was born in Indiana in 1893. He served in the Armed Forces during World War I, and he was a veterinarian—though he probably stopped practicing while they homesteaded 20 miles out of town.

He and his wife most likely picnicked on Devil’s Creek, a stream 200 feet north of their house. It crossed their land from west to east, and was the source of the aforementioned ditch. They would have strolled up their long hillside across the creek as well. Sagebrush thrives there, but from the ridge they would have witnessed sunrises and sunsets together—as well as oncoming storms and blizzards.

After leaving their homestead, Eva opened a restaurant in downtown Big Timber. My dad recalls getting Cokes at Eva’s diner as a kid. He remembers her warm hospitality. The restaurant closed during the war, but then reopened well into the 1950s. Eva was an election clerk during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s fourth and final presidential race. She outlived her husband by 10 years, dying in 1974 at the age of 78. Herbert had died in 1964 at age 70.

The Roquets homesteaded as young adults. And while they did not stay there long, they probably remembered their experiences there for the entire second half of their lives.

During the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln signed into law the Homestead Act of 1862. It allowed small farmers to claim public land all over the United States for almost no financial cost. Most people homesteaded up to 160 acres, where they had to live and “proof” (improve) the land for five years or more. Later legislation in the early 20th century provided some 320-acre options and three-year requirements. People could reduce their time obligations for $1.25-$2.50 per acre. Homesteaders had to be 21 years old or the head of their family. Given the ongoing war, veterans earned certain exemptions—but no one who had fought against the government could claim land.

Homesteading lasted for more than a century, enabling 1.6 million people to own 420,000 square miles of the nation. That is 11 percent of America or almost three times the size of Montana. The last homesteading occurred in Alaska in 1988, but most land claims had stopped 50 years earlier. Large farms, new technology, New Deal era legislation, and possibly drought and the Depression all contributed to the decline.

An intriguing fact of homesteading was the formation of otherwise unlikely relationships. People from different places moved to the same region at the same time. Some probably became friends, business partners, or helpful neighbors. Maybe they attended church together, educated their kids together, or even—since both men and women could homestead individually—got married. Then again, others would have become hermits or troublemakers. Sadly, most of these stories are gone forever.

Still, the Roquets surely would have met a fellow homestead family just a mile upstream. In fact, perhaps Henry and Minnie Fischer personally welcomed the Roquets to Devil’s Creek, since the Department of the Interior had awarded Henry his “Final Certificate” in 1924, two years prior to the Roquets. This prized document entitled Henry “to receive a Patent [No. 929688] for the land” he had claimed in 1920.

The National Archives and Records Administration furnished copies of 30 or so pages regarding Henry Fischer’s homestead. These included his immigration papers, which were crucial since the Homestead Act only applied to citizens. Of course, countless homesteaders were first-generation Americans, since millions were coming to America during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Henry was born in Germany before the American Civil War. But the Franco-Prussian War would have been more relevant to him. It occurred in 1870-1871, and it might have helped the teenaged Henry start thinking about migrating across the Atlantic.

In 1891 a district court judge in Minnesota acknowledged that “Henry Fischer has resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States, for at least five years…and that during the whole of that time he has behaved himself as a man of good moral character.” The court then ordered that he “be permitted to take the oath to support the Constitution of the United Sates, and [to renounce] all allegiance and fidelity to every Foreign Prince, Potentate, Sate, and Sovereignty whatever, and more particularly to William 2nd Emperor of Prussia.” So he was “admitted” to all “the rights, privileges, and immunities of a naturalized citizen of the United States.”

But at 38 or 39, Henry Fischer was not the youngest new citizen. And 32 years later, he certainly was not the youngest homesteader! He and Minnie had seven children. One of them, Paul, filed a “Testimony of Witness” in 1923 at the age of 37 for his father’s claim. Paul’s siblings could have been adults by then, too, so perhaps Henry and Minnie did most of the work themselves.

And work was indeed required. To get that all-important government patent, they had to “proof” the land. In 1920 they built a house, a barn, and a fence around their claim of 122 acres. Further, they broke up 25 acres of ground for crops. In 1921 they seeded and harvested 25 acres of wheat. The next year they broke up another 25 acres and reaped 50 acres of wheat. During their last trial year they planted 50 acres of wheat and oats. All of this was on rocky soil at 6300 feet elevation, and it cost them $1500—which today would be $20,000.

In addition, they could not take long vacations during their three-year claim period. In fact, in his testimony, Paul said he had seen his parents on the property every two weeks since they began to reside there. This also excluded warm-up trips to Florida during the frigid mountain winters. The elevation shot up 4000-5000 feet just five miles due west, to peaks that often have snow on them from October to June.

Finally, Henry could file no other claims during the three years, even if he found a place he liked better. The land itself could not be owned or occupied by Indians. Henry could not mine minerals during his claim years. The local newspaper was to print a notice of his intention to gain the land for five straight weeks. He also needed to find two witnesses willing to attest to all he had stated.

Meanwhile, local and federal officials had to approve all this information in an era rather void of computers, Internet, smart phones, and Priority Mail. His final paperwork began in July 1923 and ended with his Patent in January 1924. And as was customary, President Calvin Coolidge signed a letter from the United States to Henry regarding his new homestead (this was in addition to his “Final Certificate”).

The Fischers stayed on their property for a decade. Sadly, Minnie Fischer died in 1928, one year after she and Henry celebrated their golden wedding anniversary on their land. She was 73 or 74. Henry sold the small estate two years later. He died in 1936 in his mid-80s. Today only the cabin and part of another foundation remain—the rest of the land looks much as it did 90 years ago.

“Free land” was the popular cry of homesteaders. But as already noted, proving the land was not free. And in the case of one family on the eastern slopes of the Crazy Mountains, fiscal resources simply may have run out, bringing to a quick end a dream that otherwise had a spectacular view.

Fred and Estella Tucker claimed 160 acres around the same time as the Fischers. But before they even got their patent in August 1923, they mortgaged their land that April. Melville Commercial Company lent the Tuckers $103.36 “for provisions used while living on said Homestead Survey while making proof.” In other words, they needed money in order to finalize their claim from the government.

To their credit, they paid their debt in just under a year. But two days later they sold their eight-month-old homestead for “$1 and other…”—common diction in public files to conceal the full amount.

The Tuckers’ abrupt ending raises many questions. Maybe they never had enough money for the endeavor. Perhaps they lost, or misspent, their money during their claim years. The challenges of homesteading may have overwhelmed them. The bitter winters could have been unbearable. The land itself—abounding in gorgeous panoramas, but hosting lots of hills and shale and little water or timber—might have produced too little to sustain them in terms of money or food. Maybe one of them had an accident or illness. Or possibly they just got bored.

Then again, they may have been shrewd prospectors. Maybe the land, the mortgage, and the sale were beads on a long thread of quick investments. Perhaps they were running from something or somebody. A family emergency could have beckoned them away. Or they may only have passed through, decided to stay awhile, and moved on.

Whatever the cause, they lived long after their homesteading days. Fred turned 80 before he died in 1974. Estella died in 1988, having been born months before the turn of the century. Four walls of rotted logs remain where they were built soon after World War I, of which Fred was an Army veteran. The surrounding bluffs today are called the Tucker Hills. And the stately mountains look on with the same tranquility that potentially drew the Tuckers there in the first place.

According to the Bureau of Land Management, Montana had more than 150,000 homesteads, the most of any state by far. Montana also had the most homesteaded acreage—more than 30 million acres—which is more than the total land area of 20 states. Nationwide, almost 100 million people alive today are descendants of homesteaders.

For decades homesteading was both popular and challenging. Some people lied, cheated, stole—or worse. Others worked hard, raised families, blessed others, and left inheritances. But the main legacy of the Roquets, Fischers, Tuckers, and their fellow homesteaders, no matter the adversity, was freedom—freedom to own, freedom to work, freedom to be silent or to make noise, freedom to pursue dreams, freedom to fail, and freedom to succeed.

~~~~~~~~
(Originally published by the Montana Pioneer.)